Raw capture

Kevin Day details TIC TAC UAP experience, aftermath that influences him still

Kevin Day details TIC TAC UAP experience, aftermath that influences him still

  • Source: Punk Rock and UFOs
  • Author / outlet: Punk Rock and UFOs
  • Published: 2018-10-05
  • Sourced: 2026-08-14
  • Extraction: Direct HTML isolated with /code/scripts/extract_web.py using Readability and converted to Markdown.
  • Fidelity: Complete article body in source order. Links and quoted emphasis preserved; site navigation and related-page chrome omitted.
  • Related: ../../sources/fravor-nimitz-encounter-2004

Article

In his story, he mentions an extremely powerful energy manifested in consciousness that could be good and bad, which corroborates with what many experiencers and believers in metaphysics mention.

“It has been observed that close encounters (CE) with unknown aerial phenomenon (UAP) often causes notable post-effects in human observers, “ Day said. “ Like I now believe the TIC TAC encounter did to me. It's a little complicated so I'll explain:

“In 2003, Dr. Jacques F. Vallee and Dr. Eric W. Davis wrote a peer reviewed paper entitled “Incommensurability, Orthodoxy and the Physics of High Strangeness: A 6-layer Model for Anomalous Phenomena” In their paper they describe certain physical and 'anti-physical' manifestations of UAP encounters.

The paper's abstracts explains, “.The main argument presented in this paper is that the continuing study of unidentified aerial phenomena (“UAP”) may offer an existence theorem for new models of physical reality. The current SETI paradigm and its “assumption of mediocrity” place restrictions on forms of non-human intelligence that may be researched. A similar bias exists in the ufologists’ often-stated hypothesis that UAP, if real, must represent space visitors. Observing that both models are biased by anthropomorphism, the authors attempt to clarify the issues surrounding “high strangeness” observations by distinguishing six layers of information that can be derived from UAP events, namely (1) physical manifestations, (2) anti-physical effects, (3) psychological factors, (4) physiological factors, (5) psychic effects and (6) cultural effects. In a further step they propose a framework for scientific analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena that takes into account the incommensurability problem.” In my case, I seem to have been affected most strongly by Layer V, psychic effects. Vallee-Davis describe these effects further “..impressions of communication without a direct sensory channel .. poltergeist phenomena .. motions and sounds without a specific cause, outside the observed presence of a UAP .. levitation of the witness orof objects and animals in the vicinity .. maneuvers of a UAP appearing to anticipate the witness’ thoughts ..premonitory dreams or visions .. personality changes promoting unusual abilities in the witness .. healing ..” (Vallee-Davis, 2003, pg.8, para.3).

“I have experienced all of these effects with the exception of levitation. And the journey damn near killed me. Imagine it. Suddenly, your personality begins to change, you have premonitory dreams, you become suddenly smarter, more prescient, you can manifest stuff, you, apparently, healed your dog by touching him, etc. etc, and you have no idea why or what is happening to you!? The experience can, and has, triggered insanity and psychosis in some experiencers. I count myself lucky that I'm just (expletive) weird, but all of that pretext is just the scene-setter. My concern is this; when human post-effects (HPE) happens to just a few unprepared, unsuspecting people, the experience can be bad or good for them, but hat happens when disclosure does occur and CE with UAP is common place world-wide? And 7 billion unprepared, unsuspecting people are all suddenly changed? Think of it, what could go wrong? Having said that I am still in favor of disclosure happening.”

As secret studies have been reported tied to the Nimitz UFO incident and experiencers connected to it and not, Day said he’s not involved.